IROF: a low resource evaluation metric for explanation methods
read the original abstract
The adoption of machine learning in health care hinges on the transparency of the used algorithms, necessitating the need for explanation methods. However, despite a growing literature on explaining neural networks, no consensus has been reached on how to evaluate those explanation methods. We propose IROF, a new approach to evaluating explanation methods that circumvents the need for manual evaluation. Compared to other recent work, our approach requires several orders of magnitude less computational resources and no human input, making it accessible to lower resource groups and robust to human bias.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Few-class Fidelity: Evaluating Explanations of Real-conditions CNN classifiers with Optimized Perturbations
Introduces a perturbation-based fidelity metric tailored to few-class CNN classifiers for real-conditions XAI evaluation, tested on medical and natural imaging against human-centric metrics.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.