REVIEW 1 cited by
ObjectNet Dataset: Reanalysis and Correction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
ObjectNet Dataset: Reanalysis and Correction
read the original abstract
Recently, Barbu et al introduced a dataset called ObjectNet which includes objects in daily life situations. They showed a dramatic performance drop of the state of the art object recognition models on this dataset. Due to the importance and implications of their results regarding generalization ability of deep models, we take a second look at their findings. We highlight a major problem with their work which is applying object recognizers to the scenes containing multiple objects rather than isolated objects. The latter results in around 20-30% performance gain using our code. Compared with the results reported in the ObjectNet paper, we observe that around 10-15 % of the performance loss can be recovered, without any test time data augmentation. In accordance with Barbu et al.'s conclusions, however, we also conclude that deep models suffer drastically on this dataset. Thus, we believe that ObjectNet remains a challenging dataset for testing the generalization power of models beyond datasets on which they have been trained.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Reconstructing Content with Collaborative Attention for Universal Multimodal Representation Learning
CoCoA forces an MLLM to reconstruct masked text through a single EOS token, improving multimodal embedding quality on MMEB-V1 and matching MoCa at 3B with far less pretraining data.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.