Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Participatory Problem Formulation for Fairer Machine Learning Through Community Based System Dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2005.07572 v3 pith:OMARQGMT submitted 2020-05-15 cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML

Participatory Problem Formulation for Fairer Machine Learning Through Community Based System Dynamics

Donald Martin Jr. (1) , Vinodkumar Prabhakaran (1) , Jill Kuhlberg (2) , Andrew Smart (1) , William S. Isaac (3) ((1) Google (2) System Stars (3) DeepMind) This is my paper
classification cs.CY cs.LGstat.ML
keywords systemproblemdevelopmentfairnessformulationphasebiascommunity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent research on algorithmic fairness has highlighted that the problem formulation phase of ML system development can be a key source of bias that has significant downstream impacts on ML system fairness outcomes. However, very little attention has been paid to methods for improving the fairness efficacy of this critical phase of ML system development. Current practice neither accounts for the dynamic complexity of high-stakes domains nor incorporates the perspectives of vulnerable stakeholders. In this paper we introduce community based system dynamics (CBSD) as an approach to enable the participation of typically excluded stakeholders in the problem formulation phase of the ML system development process and facilitate the deep problem understanding required to mitigate bias during this crucial stage.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.5

    A genetic algorithm optimizes weighted combinations of LLM-perceived harm mitigation, expert costs, and participatory scores over stakeholder-action pairs to surface viable AI policy packages for media harms.

  2. Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models

    cs.CL 2021-12 accept novelty 6.0

    The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job...

  3. Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0

    A genetic algorithm exploring billions of policy combinations, scored by LLM-evaluated harm mitigation, expert cost, and participatory ratings, identifies viable AI policy options under different weighting schemes.