pith. sign in

arxiv: 2008.01883 · v4 · pith:YBSQHQIVnew · submitted 2020-08-04 · 📊 stat.ML · cs.LG

When is invariance useful in an Out-of-Distribution Generalization problem ?

classification 📊 stat.ML cs.LG
keywords predictorapproachescitetenvironmentsgeneralizationgeneralizeshypothesisinvariance
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

The goal of Out-of-Distribution (OOD) generalization problem is to train a predictor that generalizes on all environments. Popular approaches in this field use the hypothesis that such a predictor shall be an \textit{invariant predictor} that captures the mechanism that remains constant across environments. While these approaches have been experimentally successful in various case studies, there is still much room for the theoretical validation of this hypothesis. This paper presents a new set of theoretical conditions necessary for an invariant predictor to achieve the OOD optimality. Our theory not only applies to non-linear cases, but also generalizes the necessary condition used in \citet{rojas2018invariant}. We also derive Inter Gradient Alignment algorithm from our theory and demonstrate its competitiveness on MNIST-derived benchmark datasets as well as on two of the three \textit{Invariance Unit Tests} proposed by \citet{aubinlinear}.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Assessing Distribution Shift in Human Activity Recognition for Domain Generalization

    cs.AI 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Evaluates four distribution shifts in sensor-based HAR, finds diversity shifts dominate, and shows 28 DG methods only marginally beat ERM while releasing open benchmarks.