Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Detection of data drift and outliers affecting machine learning model performance over time

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2012.09258 v3 pith:GNTVLNYJ submitted 2020-12-16 stat.AP cs.LGstat.ML

classification stat.APcs.LGstat.ML
keywords driftmodelchangechangesdatadeploymentclassdistribution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A trained ML model is deployed on another `test' dataset where target feature values (labels) are unknown. Drift is distribution change between the training and deployment data, which is concerning if model performance changes. For a cat/dog image classifier, for instance, drift during deployment could be rabbit images (new class) or cat/dog images with changed characteristics (change in distribution). We wish to detect these changes but can't measure accuracy without deployment data labels. We instead detect drift indirectly by nonparametrically testing the distribution of model prediction confidence for changes. This generalizes our method and sidesteps domain-specific feature representation. We address important statistical issues, particularly Type-1 error control in sequential testing, using Change Point Models (CPMs; see Adams and Ross 2012). We also use nonparametric outlier methods to show the user suspicious observations for model diagnosis, since the before/after change confidence distributions overlap significantly. In experiments to demonstrate robustness, we train on a subset of MNIST digit classes, then insert drift (e.g., unseen digit class) in deployment data in various settings (gradual/sudden changes in the drift proportion). A novel loss function is introduced to compare the performance (detection delay, Type-1 and 2 errors) of a drift detector under different levels of drift class contamination.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cloud-Native Evaluation-as-a-Service: A Microservices Architecture for Scalable AI Monitoring with Conformal Guarantees

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A reference architecture packages conformal prediction, calibration, drift detection, and fairness monitoring as six Kubernetes microservices, with experiments showing coverage and drift-detection behavior consistent ...

  2. Label-Free Concept Drift Assessment for Reliable AI in Emerging Wireless Applications

    cs.NI 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    CFPT and TabAutoDrift detect concept drift by comparing macro-F1 scores from pseudo-label or transfer-learning retraining, reaching F1 of 0.94 in fingerprinting and 1.00 in link anomalies without post-deployment labels.

  3. Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Healthcare experts who manually adjusted training data improved a diabetes prediction model more than those using automated corrections, without losing trust or understanding.

  4. GTS_Forecaster: a novel deep learning based geodetic time series forecasting toolbox with python

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new Python toolbox integrates deep learning models, gap-filling, and evaluation metrics for geodetic time series forecasting, with KAN-augmented models reported to improve long-term accuracy.

Pith tools