REVIEW 4 cited by
Detection of data drift and outliers affecting machine learning model performance over time
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A trained ML model is deployed on another `test' dataset where target feature values (labels) are unknown. Drift is distribution change between the training and deployment data, which is concerning if model performance changes. For a cat/dog image classifier, for instance, drift during deployment could be rabbit images (new class) or cat/dog images with changed characteristics (change in distribution). We wish to detect these changes but can't measure accuracy without deployment data labels. We instead detect drift indirectly by nonparametrically testing the distribution of model prediction confidence for changes. This generalizes our method and sidesteps domain-specific feature representation. We address important statistical issues, particularly Type-1 error control in sequential testing, using Change Point Models (CPMs; see Adams and Ross 2012). We also use nonparametric outlier methods to show the user suspicious observations for model diagnosis, since the before/after change confidence distributions overlap significantly. In experiments to demonstrate robustness, we train on a subset of MNIST digit classes, then insert drift (e.g., unseen digit class) in deployment data in various settings (gradual/sudden changes in the drift proportion). A novel loss function is introduced to compare the performance (detection delay, Type-1 and 2 errors) of a drift detector under different levels of drift class contamination.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Cloud-Native Evaluation-as-a-Service: A Microservices Architecture for Scalable AI Monitoring with Conformal Guarantees
A reference architecture packages conformal prediction, calibration, drift detection, and fairness monitoring as six Kubernetes microservices, with experiments showing coverage and drift-detection behavior consistent ...
-
Label-Free Concept Drift Assessment for Reliable AI in Emerging Wireless Applications
CFPT and TabAutoDrift detect concept drift by comparing macro-F1 scores from pseudo-label or transfer-learning retraining, reaching F1 of 0.94 in fingerprinting and 1.00 in link anomalies without post-deployment labels.
-
Importance of User Control in Data-Centric Steering for Healthcare Experts
Healthcare experts who manually adjusted training data improved a diabetes prediction model more than those using automated corrections, without losing trust or understanding.
-
GTS_Forecaster: a novel deep learning based geodetic time series forecasting toolbox with python
A new Python toolbox integrates deep learning models, gap-filling, and evaluation metrics for geodetic time series forecasting, with KAN-augmented models reported to improve long-term accuracy.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.