Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Gravity Optimizer: a Kinematic Approach on Optimization in Deep Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.09192 v1 pith:7ZFZJNJA submitted 2021-01-22 cs.LG cs.AImath.OC

Gravity Optimizer: a Kinematic Approach on Optimization in Deep Learning

classification cs.LG cs.AImath.OC
keywords gravityoptimizeradamdatasetsdeephyper-parameterslearningloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Gravity, another algorithm for gradient-based optimization. In this paper, we explain how our novel idea change parameters to reduce the deep learning model's loss. It has three intuitive hyper-parameters that the best values for them are proposed. Also, we propose an alternative to moving average. To compare the performance of the Gravity optimizer with two common optimizers, Adam and RMSProp, five standard datasets were trained on two VGGNet models with a batch size of 128 for 100 epochs. Gravity hyper-parameters did not need to be tuned for different models. As will be explained more in the paper, to investigate the direct impact of the optimizer itself on loss reduction no overfitting prevention technique was used. The obtained results show that the Gravity optimizer has more stable performance than Adam and RMSProp and gives greater values of validation accuracy for datasets with more output classes like CIFAR-100 (Fine).

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. OmniOpt: Taxonomy, Geometry, and Benchmarking of Modern Optimizers

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A meta-pipeline plus LMO four-axis view yields a dual taxonomy of 108 optimizers, and a multi-objective LLM/vision benchmark shows no single family dominates the quality–cost–memory frontier.