Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Technical Challenges for Training Fair Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.06764 v1 pith:EODZNWER submitted 2021-02-12 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
keywords fairnessbeenconcernsfacialmedicalmethodsmodelsnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As machine learning algorithms have been widely deployed across applications, many concerns have been raised over the fairness of their predictions, especially in high stakes settings (such as facial recognition and medical imaging). To respond to these concerns, the community has proposed and formalized various notions of fairness as well as methods for rectifying unfair behavior. While fairness constraints have been studied extensively for classical models, the effectiveness of methods for imposing fairness on deep neural networks is unclear. In this paper, we observe that these large models overfit to fairness objectives, and produce a range of unintended and undesirable consequences. We conduct our experiments on both facial recognition and automated medical diagnosis datasets using state-of-the-art architectures.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SWiFT: Soft-Mask Weight Fine-tuning for Bias Mitigation

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A soft-mask that ranks each network weight by its contribution to bias versus accuracy lets a pretrained medical classifier be debiased in a few fine-tuning epochs on a small balanced dataset, with accuracy maintained.

  2. Disentanglement and Assessment of Shortcuts in Ophthalmological Retinal Imaging Exams

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On mBRSET, disentangling sensitive attributes from DR predictions improved DINOv2 AUROC by 2 points but dropped ConvNeXt V2 by 7 and Swin V2 by 3, with no consistent fairness gain.

Pith tools