REVIEW 2 cited by
Technical Challenges for Training Fair Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As machine learning algorithms have been widely deployed across applications, many concerns have been raised over the fairness of their predictions, especially in high stakes settings (such as facial recognition and medical imaging). To respond to these concerns, the community has proposed and formalized various notions of fairness as well as methods for rectifying unfair behavior. While fairness constraints have been studied extensively for classical models, the effectiveness of methods for imposing fairness on deep neural networks is unclear. In this paper, we observe that these large models overfit to fairness objectives, and produce a range of unintended and undesirable consequences. We conduct our experiments on both facial recognition and automated medical diagnosis datasets using state-of-the-art architectures.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SWiFT: Soft-Mask Weight Fine-tuning for Bias Mitigation
A soft-mask that ranks each network weight by its contribution to bias versus accuracy lets a pretrained medical classifier be debiased in a few fine-tuning epochs on a small balanced dataset, with accuracy maintained.
-
Disentanglement and Assessment of Shortcuts in Ophthalmological Retinal Imaging Exams
On mBRSET, disentangling sensitive attributes from DR predictions improved DINOv2 AUROC by 2 points but dropped ConvNeXt V2 by 7 and Swin V2 by 3, with no consistent fairness gain.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.