Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Pros and Cons of GAN Evaluation Measures: New Developments

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2103.09396 v3 pith:X6DGBLMD submitted 2021-03-17 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CV
keywords evaluationimportantinceptionmeasuresmodelsprogressalthoughareas
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This work is an update of a previous paper on the same topic published a few years ago. With the dramatic progress in generative modeling, a suite of new quantitative and qualitative techniques to evaluate models has emerged. Although some measures such as Inception Score, Frechet Inception Distance, Precision-Recall, and Perceptual Path Length are relatively more popular, GAN evaluation is not a settled issue and there is still room for improvement. Here, I describe new dimensions that are becoming important in assessing models (e.g. bias and fairness) and discuss the connection between GAN evaluation and deepfakes. These are important areas of concern in the machine learning community today and progress in GAN evaluation can help mitigate them.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scaling Quantum Machine Learning without Tricks: Full-Resolution and Diverse Image Generation

    quant-ph 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single end-to-end quantum generator using an image-tailored circuit and learnable multimodal noise achieves state-of-the-art simulated FID scores on full MNIST and Fashion-MNIST without tricks.

Pith tools