REVIEW 2 cited by
StylePTB: A Compositional Benchmark for Fine-grained Controllable Text Style Transfer
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Text style transfer aims to controllably generate text with targeted stylistic changes while maintaining core meaning from the source sentence constant. Many of the existing style transfer benchmarks primarily focus on individual high-level semantic changes (e.g. positive to negative), which enable controllability at a high level but do not offer fine-grained control involving sentence structure, emphasis, and content of the sentence. In this paper, we introduce a large-scale benchmark, StylePTB, with (1) paired sentences undergoing 21 fine-grained stylistic changes spanning atomic lexical, syntactic, semantic, and thematic transfers of text, as well as (2) compositions of multiple transfers which allow modeling of fine-grained stylistic changes as building blocks for more complex, high-level transfers. By benchmarking existing methods on StylePTB, we find that they struggle to model fine-grained changes and have an even more difficult time composing multiple styles. As a result, StylePTB brings novel challenges that we hope will encourage future research in controllable text style transfer, compositional models, and learning disentangled representations. Solving these challenges would present important steps towards controllable text generation.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SciFaultyQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Faulty Science Question Detection with a GAN-Inspired Approach to Synthetic Dataset Generation
SciFaultyQA is a 1,333-question benchmark of intentionally faulty science questions on which GPT-4o detects only 16% of faults, improved to 65% with web search integration.
-
Style Extraction on Text Embeddings Using VAE and Parallel Dataset
A VAE (actually an autoencoder) trained on KJV minus ASV embedding differences separates ASV from other Bible translations by reconstruction error, with an unstable claimed accuracy around 84 percent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.