Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

StylePTB: A Compositional Benchmark for Fine-grained Controllable Text Style Transfer

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.05196 v1 pith:O4PAXFHZ submitted 2021-04-12 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords textchangesfine-grainedstylestyleptbtransfercontrollablesentence
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text style transfer aims to controllably generate text with targeted stylistic changes while maintaining core meaning from the source sentence constant. Many of the existing style transfer benchmarks primarily focus on individual high-level semantic changes (e.g. positive to negative), which enable controllability at a high level but do not offer fine-grained control involving sentence structure, emphasis, and content of the sentence. In this paper, we introduce a large-scale benchmark, StylePTB, with (1) paired sentences undergoing 21 fine-grained stylistic changes spanning atomic lexical, syntactic, semantic, and thematic transfers of text, as well as (2) compositions of multiple transfers which allow modeling of fine-grained stylistic changes as building blocks for more complex, high-level transfers. By benchmarking existing methods on StylePTB, we find that they struggle to model fine-grained changes and have an even more difficult time composing multiple styles. As a result, StylePTB brings novel challenges that we hope will encourage future research in controllable text style transfer, compositional models, and learning disentangled representations. Solving these challenges would present important steps towards controllable text generation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SciFaultyQA: Benchmarking LLMs on Faulty Science Question Detection with a GAN-Inspired Approach to Synthetic Dataset Generation

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    SciFaultyQA is a 1,333-question benchmark of intentionally faulty science questions on which GPT-4o detects only 16% of faults, improved to 65% with web search integration.

  2. Style Extraction on Text Embeddings Using VAE and Parallel Dataset

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A VAE (actually an autoencoder) trained on KJV minus ASV embedding differences separates ASV from other Bible translations by reconstruction error, with an unstable claimed accuracy around 84 percent.

Pith tools