Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

SOSP: Efficiently Capturing Global Correlations by Second-Order Structured Pruning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2110.11395 v2 pith:HTJYJOCW submitted 2021-10-19 cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML

SOSP: Efficiently Capturing Global Correlations by Second-Order Structured Pruning

classification cs.LG cs.CVstat.ML
keywords sosp-hpruningcorrelationsmethodmethodssecond-orderstructuresaccuracy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pruning neural networks reduces inference time and memory costs. On standard hardware, these benefits will be especially prominent if coarse-grained structures, like feature maps, are pruned. We devise two novel saliency-based methods for second-order structured pruning (SOSP) which include correlations among all structures and layers. Our main method SOSP-H employs an innovative second-order approximation, which enables saliency evaluations by fast Hessian-vector products. SOSP-H thereby scales like a first-order method despite taking into account the full Hessian. We validate SOSP-H by comparing it to our second method SOSP-I that uses a well-established Hessian approximation, and to numerous state-of-the-art methods. While SOSP-H performs on par or better in terms of accuracy, it has clear advantages in terms of scalability and efficiency. This allowed us to scale SOSP-H to large-scale vision tasks, even though it captures correlations across all layers of the network. To underscore the global nature of our pruning methods, we evaluate their performance not only by removing structures from a pretrained network, but also by detecting architectural bottlenecks. We show that our algorithms allow to systematically reveal architectural bottlenecks, which we then remove to further increase the accuracy of the networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Post-Training Neural Network Pruning using Graph Curvature

    cs.LG 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0

    An activation-aware graph-curvature score ranks neural connections for post-training pruning, preserving accuracy as well as or better than magnitude, SNIP, or SynFlow on MNIST/CIFAR models in one-shot removal tests.

  2. Automatic Pruning Discovery for Large Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0

    AutoPrune uses LLM-driven search to generate a pruning formula and SDSA to allocate sparsity by layer skewness, reporting small perplexity gains over Wanda and SparseGPT on several LLaMA models.