Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Availability Attacks Create Shortcuts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2111.00898 v2 pith:U4Q5EHB6 submitted 2021-11-01 cs.LG cs.CR

Availability Attacks Create Shortcuts

classification cs.LG cs.CR
keywords attacksperturbationsavailabilitydataemphlearningshortcutsthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Availability attacks, which poison the training data with imperceptible perturbations, can make the data \emph{not exploitable} by machine learning algorithms so as to prevent unauthorized use of data. In this work, we investigate why these perturbations work in principle. We are the first to unveil an important population property of the perturbations of these attacks: they are almost \textbf{linearly separable} when assigned with the target labels of the corresponding samples, which hence can work as \emph{shortcuts} for the learning objective. We further verify that linear separability is indeed the workhorse for availability attacks. We synthesize linearly-separable perturbations as attacks and show that they are as powerful as the deliberately crafted attacks. Moreover, such synthetic perturbations are much easier to generate. For example, previous attacks need dozens of hours to generate perturbations for ImageNet while our algorithm only needs several seconds. Our finding also suggests that the \emph{shortcut learning} is more widely present than previously believed as deep models would rely on shortcuts even if they are of an imperceptible scale and mixed together with the normal features. Our source code is published at \url{https://github.com/dayu11/Availability-Attacks-Create-Shortcuts}.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Nonlinear Transformations Against Unlearnable Datasets

    cs.LG 2024-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Nonlinear transformations enable DNNs to achieve substantial test accuracy gains (0.34% to 249.59%) on unlearnable CIFAR10 datasets from twelve protection methods, outperforming a recent linear baseline.

  2. SoK: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Current Status of Neural Tangent Generalization Attacks with Research Directions

    cs.LG 2026-05 accept novelty 3.0

    NTGA is the first clean-label generalization attack under black-box settings but is vulnerable to adversarial training and image transformations, with newer attacks outperforming it.