pith. sign in

arxiv: 2203.05550 · v3 · pith:2CKSS3ATnew · submitted 2022-03-10 · 💻 cs.CV

Back to the Feature: Classical 3D Features are (Almost) All You Need for 3D Anomaly Detection

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords informationmethodsanomalydetectionmethodanomaliesbackcolor
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Despite significant advances in image anomaly detection and segmentation, few methods use 3D information. We utilize a recently introduced 3D anomaly detection dataset to evaluate whether or not using 3D information is a lost opportunity. First, we present a surprising finding: standard color-only methods outperform all current methods that are explicitly designed to exploit 3D information. This is counter-intuitive as even a simple inspection of the dataset shows that color-only methods are insufficient for images containing geometric anomalies. This motivates the question: how can anomaly detection methods effectively use 3D information? We investigate a range of shape representations including hand-crafted and deep-learning-based; we demonstrate that rotation invariance plays the leading role in the performance. We uncover a simple 3D-only method that beats all recent approaches while not using deep learning, external pre-training datasets, or color information. As the 3D-only method cannot detect color and texture anomalies, we combine it with color-based features, significantly outperforming previous state-of-the-art. Our method, dubbed BTF (Back to the Feature) achieves pixel-wise ROCAUC: 99.3% and PRO: 96.4% on MVTec 3D-AD.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking the Rigid Prior: Towards Articulated 3D Anomaly Detection

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The paper releases the ArtiAD benchmark with 15k+ articulated point clouds and shows that a pose-conditioned SDF baseline reaches 0.884/0.874 AUROC on seen/unseen joint configurations, outperforming rigid priors.