Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Recognising the importance of preference change: A call for a coordinated multidisciplinary research effort in the age of AI

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2203.10525 v2 pith:O77URFVS submitted 2022-03-20 cs.AI cs.HC

classification cs.AIcs.HC
keywords changepreferencesystemsbehaviorpreferencesdisciplinesframeworkimportance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence becomes more powerful and a ubiquitous presence in daily life, it is imperative to understand and manage the impact of AI systems on our lives and decisions. Modern ML systems often change user behavior (e.g. personalized recommender systems learn user preferences to deliver recommendations that change online behavior). An externality of behavior change is preference change. This article argues for the establishment of a multidisciplinary endeavor focused on understanding how AI systems change preference: Preference Science. We operationalize preference to incorporate concepts from various disciplines, outlining the importance of meta-preferences and preference-change preferences, and proposing a preliminary framework for how preferences change. We draw a distinction between preference change, permissible preference change, and outright preference manipulation. A diversity of disciplines contribute unique insights to this framework.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AI Value Alignment for Evolving Social Norms

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Static AI alignment to historical user values produces value lock-in and can collapse distinct social norms into a maladaptive consensus, so alignment should be dynamic and adaptive.

  2. Constructive Alignment: Governing Preference Dynamics in Human-AI Interaction

    cs.AI 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    Alignment should be a control problem over layered, dynamic, interaction-constructed preference trajectories, constrained by coherence, reflective endorsement, bounded influence, epistemic integrity, and empowerment.

Pith tools