Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2204.08356 v7 pith:HXGHHQKF submitted 2022-04-18 econ.EM stat.ME

Inference for Cluster Randomized Experiments with Non-ignorable Cluster Sizes

classification econ.EM stat.ME
keywords clustersizestreatmentrandomizedexperimentsinferencenon-ignorableanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper considers the problem of inference in cluster randomized experiments when cluster sizes are non-ignorable. Here, by a cluster randomized experiment, we mean one in which treatment is assigned at the cluster level. By non-ignorable cluster sizes, we refer to the possibility that the treatment effects may depend non-trivially on the cluster sizes. We frame our analysis in a super-population framework in which cluster sizes are random. In this way, our analysis departs from earlier analyses of cluster randomized experiments in which cluster sizes are treated as non-random. We distinguish between two different parameters of interest: the equally-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect, and the size-weighted cluster-level average treatment effect. For each parameter, we provide methods for inference in an asymptotic framework where the number of clusters tends to infinity and treatment is assigned using a covariate-adaptive stratified randomization procedure. We additionally permit the experimenter to sample only a subset of the units within each cluster rather than the entire cluster and demonstrate the implications of such sampling for some commonly used estimators. A small simulation study and empirical demonstration show the practical relevance of our theoretical results.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Misspecified regressions with mixed regressors: robust inference and causal interpretation

    math.ST 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0

    Misspecified Z-estimation and OLS with mixed (random+fixed) regressors yield conservative robust SEs and identify causal ATEs under randomization, with corrections for fully-interacted specs and clustered data.