REVIEW 1 cited by
Can Foundation Models Talk Causality?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Can Foundation Models Talk Causality?
read the original abstract
Foundation models are subject to an ongoing heated debate, leaving open the question of progress towards AGI and dividing the community into two camps: the ones who see the arguably impressive results as evidence to the scaling hypothesis, and the others who are worried about the lack of interpretability and reasoning capabilities. By investigating to which extent causal representations might be captured by these large scale language models, we make a humble efforts towards resolving the ongoing philosophical conflicts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
DTO: a Differentiable Training Objective for Effective Counterfactual Story Rewriting
DTO is a new differentiable objective combining fidelity to reference rewrites and semantic consistency that outperforms MLE and preference baselines while matching LLMs on TimeTravel and ART datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.