Can Push-forward Generative Models Fit Multimodal Distributions?
read the original abstract
Many generative models synthesize data by transforming a standard Gaussian random variable using a deterministic neural network. Among these models are the Variational Autoencoders and the Generative Adversarial Networks. In this work, we call them "push-forward" models and study their expressivity. We show that the Lipschitz constant of these generative networks has to be large in order to fit multimodal distributions. More precisely, we show that the total variation distance and the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the generated and the data distribution are bounded from below by a constant depending on the mode separation and the Lipschitz constant. Since constraining the Lipschitz constants of neural networks is a common way to stabilize generative models, there is a provable trade-off between the ability of push-forward models to approximate multimodal distributions and the stability of their training. We validate our findings on one-dimensional and image datasets and empirically show that generative models consisting of stacked networks with stochastic input at each step, such as diffusion models do not suffer of such limitations.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Why Do Few-Step Text Latents Fail When Image Latents Work? Non-Commitment at Sharp Categorical Readouts
Few-step deterministic maps on continuous text latents fail because they cannot resolve discrete branch choices before sharp categorical readouts, with failure governed by decoder sharpness rather than transport accuracy.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.