Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Multiple-Choice Question Generation: Towards an Automated Assessment Framework

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.11830 v1 pith:VK3W5C5J submitted 2022-09-23 cs.CL cs.AI

Multiple-Choice Question Generation: Towards an Automated Assessment Framework

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords assessmentmultiple-choicequestionquestionsautomatedgeneratedgenerationsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Automated question generation is an important approach to enable personalisation of English comprehension assessment. Recently, transformer-based pretrained language models have demonstrated the ability to produce appropriate questions from a context paragraph. Typically, these systems are evaluated against a reference set of manually generated questions using n-gram based metrics, or manual qualitative assessment. Here, we focus on a fully automated multiple-choice question generation (MCQG) system where both the question and possible answers must be generated from the context paragraph. Applying n-gram based approaches is challenging for this form of system as the reference set is unlikely to capture the full range of possible questions and answer options. Conversely manual assessment scales poorly and is expensive for MCQG system development. In this work, we propose a set of performance criteria that assess different aspects of the generated multiple-choice questions of interest. These qualities include: grammatical correctness, answerability, diversity and complexity. Initial systems for each of these metrics are described, and individually evaluated on standard multiple-choice reading comprehension corpora.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BenchMarker: An Education-Inspired Toolkit for Highlighting Flaws in Multiple-Choice Benchmarks

    cs.CL 2026-02 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    BenchMarker toolkit audits 12 MCQA benchmarks for contamination, shortcuts, and writing errors using LLM judges, finding widespread flaws that inflate or deflate accuracy and alter rankings.