pith. sign in

arxiv: 2210.14250 · v1 · pith:3MENU2E7new · submitted 2022-10-25 · 💻 cs.CL

Exploring Document-Level Literary Machine Translation with Parallel Paragraphs from World Literature

classification 💻 cs.CL
keywords literarypar3translationtranslatorshumanautomaticexpertslanguage
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Literary translation is a culturally significant task, but it is bottlenecked by the small number of qualified literary translators relative to the many untranslated works published around the world. Machine translation (MT) holds potential to complement the work of human translators by improving both training procedures and their overall efficiency. Literary translation is less constrained than more traditional MT settings since translators must balance meaning equivalence, readability, and critical interpretability in the target language. This property, along with the complex discourse-level context present in literary texts, also makes literary MT more challenging to computationally model and evaluate. To explore this task, we collect a dataset (Par3) of non-English language novels in the public domain, each aligned at the paragraph level to both human and automatic English translations. Using Par3, we discover that expert literary translators prefer reference human translations over machine-translated paragraphs at a rate of 84%, while state-of-the-art automatic MT metrics do not correlate with those preferences. The experts note that MT outputs contain not only mistranslations, but also discourse-disrupting errors and stylistic inconsistencies. To address these problems, we train a post-editing model whose output is preferred over normal MT output at a rate of 69% by experts. We publicly release Par3 at https://github.com/katherinethai/par3/ to spur future research into literary MT.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fluency and Faithfulness in Human and Machine Literary Translation

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    Large-scale analysis of literary translations reveals a consistent negative correlation between fluency (measured via POS n-gram translationese classifier) and faithfulness (COMET-KIWI), controlled for length, across ...