REVIEW 1 cited by
Epicurus at SemEval-2023 Task 4: Improving Prediction of Human Values behind Arguments by Leveraging Their Definitions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We describe our experiments for SemEval-2023 Task 4 on the identification of human values behind arguments (ValueEval). Because human values are subjective concepts which require precise definitions, we hypothesize that incorporating the definitions of human values (in the form of annotation instructions and validated survey items) during model training can yield better prediction performance. We explore this idea and show that our proposed models perform better than the challenge organizers' baselines, with improvements in macro F1 scores of up to 18%.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Identifying and Understanding Human Values in Text: A Tailorable LLM-based Architecture
A modular LLM architecture generates value specifications from theory texts, then detects and intensity-rates human values in arbitrary text, evaluated at ~0.34 micro-F1 on ValueEval.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.