pith. sign in

arxiv: 2303.06058 · v3 · pith:3V33VWOXnew · submitted 2023-03-10 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

A General Recipe for the Analysis of Randomized Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithms

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords distributionsalgorithmssomebanditboundedfamiliesregretanalysis
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

In this paper we propose a general methodology to derive regret bounds for randomized multi-armed bandit algorithms. It consists in checking a set of sufficient conditions on the sampling probability of each arm and on the family of distributions to prove a logarithmic regret. As a direct application we revisit two famous bandit algorithms, Minimum Empirical Divergence (MED) and Thompson Sampling (TS), under various models for the distributions including single parameter exponential families, Gaussian distributions, bounded distributions, or distributions satisfying some conditions on their moments. In particular, we prove that MED is asymptotically optimal for all these models, but also provide a simple regret analysis of some TS algorithms for which the optimality is already known. We then further illustrate the interest of our approach, by analyzing a new Non-Parametric TS algorithm (h-NPTS), adapted to some families of unbounded reward distributions with a bounded h-moment. This model can for instance capture some non-parametric families of distributions whose variance is upper bounded by a known constant.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Bandits for Efficient Experimentation: Adapting to Control Group, Preferences, and Context Drifts

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Dri-MED achieves Õ(κ d² log T / Δ̃) regret and Õ(d) constraint violations for drifting contextual bandits with personalized preferences and baseline constraints under practitioner-friendly assumptions.