Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for Embodied Agents

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.02412 v2 pith:OYO2KWDC submitted 2023-05-03 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

Plan, Eliminate, and Track -- Language Models are Good Teachers for Embodied Agents

classification cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG
keywords eliminatemoduleplantrackactionagentcontrolfine-tuning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) capture procedural knowledge about the world. Recent work has leveraged LLM's ability to generate abstract plans to simplify challenging control tasks, either by action scoring, or action modeling (fine-tuning). However, the transformer architecture inherits several constraints that make it difficult for the LLM to directly serve as the agent: e.g. limited input lengths, fine-tuning inefficiency, bias from pre-training, and incompatibility with non-text environments. To maintain compatibility with a low-level trainable actor, we propose to instead use the knowledge in LLMs to simplify the control problem, rather than solving it. We propose the Plan, Eliminate, and Track (PET) framework. The Plan module translates a task description into a list of high-level sub-tasks. The Eliminate module masks out irrelevant objects and receptacles from the observation for the current sub-task. Finally, the Track module determines whether the agent has accomplished each sub-task. On the AlfWorld instruction following benchmark, the PET framework leads to a significant 15% improvement over SOTA for generalization to human goal specifications.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. FORGE: Research-Trajectory Hijacking Attacks on Deep Research Agents

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    FORGE poisons deep-research planning with coordinated fake reasoning documents, reaching 26.4% PRISM report contamination at five injections; Root Query Anchoring halves that severity.

  2. A Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Dimensional Reduced-Order Model Planning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A multi-agent LLM framework with ontology RAG and MILP-guided search automates forward and inverse 0D reduced-order network design across aero-engine air systems, power grids, and water networks.

  3. A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agents

    cs.AI 2023-08 accept novelty 6.0

    A survey of LLM-based autonomous agents that proposes a unified framework for their construction and reviews applications in social science, natural science, and engineering along with evaluation methods and future di...

  4. The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Survey

    cs.AI 2023-09 accept novelty 4.0

    The paper surveys the origins, frameworks, applications, and open challenges of AI agents built on large language models.