REVIEW 2 cited by
Pareto Optimal Learning for Estimating Large Language Model Errors
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive abilities in many applications. When a concrete and precise answer is desired, it is important to have a quantitative estimation of the potential error rate. However, this can be challenging due to the text-in-text-out nature of generative models. We present a method based on Pareto optimization that generates a risk score to estimate the probability of error in an LLM response by integrating multiple sources of information. We prove theoretically that the error estimator optimized in our framework aligns with the LLM and the information sources in an Pareto optimal manner. Experimental results show that the risk scores estimated by our method are well correlated with the true LLM error rate, thus facilitating error correction. By dynamically combining with prompting strategies such as self-verification and information retrieval, we demonstrate the proposed method can be utilized to increase the performance of an LLM, surpassing state-of-the-art task specific models.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Texts
A personalized calibration network that combines LLM answers to multiple rubric questions predicted human judges' overall satisfaction scores on dialogues about twice as accurately as the uncalibrated LLM.
-
Unveiling Uncertainty: A Deep Dive into Calibration and Performance of Multimodal Large Language Models
Multimodal LLMs are persistently miscalibrated, their calibration barely changes after fine-tuning or multimodal training, and they prefer giving answers to admitting ignorance, though prompting and temperature scalin...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.