Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft Interventions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.06250 v3 pith:BFVNICFJ submitted 2023-07-12 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH

Identifiability Guarantees for Causal Disentanglement from Soft Interventions

classification stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.MEstat.TH
keywords causaldatalatentmodeldisentanglementvariablesfaithfulnessidentifiability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causal disentanglement aims to uncover a representation of data using latent variables that are interrelated through a causal model. Such a representation is identifiable if the latent model that explains the data is unique. In this paper, we focus on the scenario where unpaired observational and interventional data are available, with each intervention changing the mechanism of a latent variable. When the causal variables are fully observed, statistically consistent algorithms have been developed to identify the causal model under faithfulness assumptions. We here show that identifiability can still be achieved with unobserved causal variables, given a generalized notion of faithfulness. Our results guarantee that we can recover the latent causal model up to an equivalence class and predict the effect of unseen combinations of interventions, in the limit of infinite data. We implement our causal disentanglement framework by developing an autoencoding variational Bayes algorithm and apply it to the problem of predicting combinatorial perturbation effects in genomics.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. From Isolation to Entanglement: When Do Interpretability Methods Identify and Disentangle Known Concepts?

    cs.LG 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0

    Correlational disentanglement scores do not guarantee that steering a feature changes only its target concept; current featurizers entangle concepts in their causal effects.