Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Why We Don't Have AGI Yet

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2308.03598 v4 pith:O77DULPO submitted 2023-08-07 cs.AI

Peter Voss , Mladjan Jovanovic This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.AI
keywords fieldseveralbeenprogressvisionabilitiesachieveadaptability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The original vision of AI was re-articulated in 2002 via the term 'Artificial General Intelligence' or AGI. This vision is to build 'Thinking Machines' - computer systems that can learn, reason, and solve problems similar to the way humans do. This is in stark contrast to the 'Narrow AI' approach practiced by almost everyone in the field over the many decades. While several large-scale efforts have nominally been working on AGI (most notably DeepMind), the field of pure focused AGI development has not been well funded or promoted. This is surprising given the fantastic value that true AGI can bestow on humanity. In addition to the dearth of effort in this field, there are also several theoretical and methodical missteps that are hampering progress. We highlight why purely statistical approaches are unlikely to lead to AGI, and identify several crucial cognitive abilities required to achieve human-like adaptability and autonomous learning. We conclude with a survey of socio-technical factors that have undoubtedly slowed progress towards AGI.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Brain-inspired AI Agent: The Way Towards AGI

    cs.NE 2024-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a brain-inspired agent architecture built from cortical-region modules and functional connectivity networks as a conceptual route to AGI, without empirical validation.

  2. Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A broad survey arguing that AGI requires modular, memory-augmented, embodied architectures rather than scaled-up token prediction, with a brief proposal to decompose intelligence into five components.

Pith tools