Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.08952 v2 pith:LH4GGYIT submitted 2023-09-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords editingknowledgelanguagecross-lingualllmsmodelseffectchinese
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge editing aims to change language models' performance on several special cases (i.e., editing scope) by infusing the corresponding expected knowledge into them. With the recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), knowledge editing has been shown as a promising technique to adapt LLMs to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. However, most of the previous studies neglect the multi-lingual nature of some main-stream LLMs (e.g., LLaMA, ChatGPT and GPT-4), and typically focus on monolingual scenarios, where LLMs are edited and evaluated in the same language. As a result, it is still unknown the effect of source language editing on a different target language. In this paper, we aim to figure out this cross-lingual effect in knowledge editing. Specifically, we first collect a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset by translating ZsRE from English to Chinese. Then, we conduct English editing on various knowledge editing methods covering different paradigms, and evaluate their performance in Chinese, and vice versa. To give deeper analyses of the cross-lingual effect, the evaluation includes four aspects, i.e., reliability, generality, locality and portability. Furthermore, we analyze the inconsistent behaviors of the edited models and discuss their specific challenges. Data and codes are available at https://github.com/krystalan/Bi_ZsRE

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Towards Efficient and Effective Alignment of Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A thesis presenting Lion, WebR, LTE, BMC, and FollowBench, five empirical methods that together address LLM alignment data, training, and evaluation.

  2. Mass-Editing Memory with Attention in Transformers: A cross-lingual exploration of knowledge

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MEMAT combines MEMIT weight edits with optimized attention-head corrections, improving cross-lingual success and magnitude metrics over MEMIT in English and Catalan.

  3. Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for Baltic and Nordic languages: A study on Lithuanian History

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a translated Lithuanian history multiple-choice benchmark, GPT-4o beats all tested open and Nordic-tuned models, and Nordic-language fine-tuning does not improve accuracy.

Pith tools