Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Causal machine learning for single-cell genomics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.14935 v1 pith:6QVG46BG submitted 2023-10-23 cs.LG q-bio.GN

classification cs.LGq-bio.GN
keywords causalsingle-cellbiologicaldatalearningapproachesmodelsadvances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Advances in single-cell omics allow for unprecedented insights into the transcription profiles of individual cells. When combined with large-scale perturbation screens, through which specific biological mechanisms can be targeted, these technologies allow for measuring the effect of targeted perturbations on the whole transcriptome. These advances provide an opportunity to better understand the causative role of genes in complex biological processes such as gene regulation, disease progression or cellular development. However, the high-dimensional nature of the data, coupled with the intricate complexity of biological systems renders this task nontrivial. Within the machine learning community, there has been a recent increase of interest in causality, with a focus on adapting established causal techniques and algorithms to handle high-dimensional data. In this perspective, we delineate the application of these methodologies within the realm of single-cell genomics and their challenges. We first present the model that underlies most of current causal approaches to single-cell biology and discuss and challenge the assumptions it entails from the biological point of view. We then identify open problems in the application of causal approaches to single-cell data: generalising to unseen environments, learning interpretable models, and learning causal models of dynamics. For each problem, we discuss how various research directions - including the development of computational approaches and the adaptation of experimental protocols - may offer ways forward, or on the contrary pose some difficulties. With the advent of single cell atlases and increasing perturbation data, we expect causal models to become a crucial tool for informed experimental design.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Goal-Oriented Sequential Bayesian Experimental Design for Causal Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GO-CBED trains a transformer policy to choose intervention sequences that maximize expected information gain on a user-specified causal query, using a variational bound with normalizing-flow posteriors, and reports ga...

  2. Interpretable Causal Representation Learning for Biological Data in the Pathway Space

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SENA-discrepancy-VAE combines a pathway-masked encoder with discrepancy-VAE, giving causal latent factors interpretable as biological process combinations with comparable unseen-perturbation prediction.

  3. A Multi-Modal AI Copilot for Single-Cell Analysis with Instruction Following

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multimodal language model, InstructCell, follows natural-language commands to annotate cell types, predict drug sensitivity, and generate realistic single-cell expression profiles.

  4. The Landscape of Causal Discovery Data: Grounding Causal Discovery in Real-World Applications

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A systematic review showing causal discovery evaluation is still dominated by small, low-diversity datasets and structural metrics, with a curated set of realistic alternatives.

Pith tools