Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Automated discovery of trade-off between utility, privacy and fairness in machine learning models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.15691 v1 pith:TJGVVC2Q submitted 2023-11-27 cs.LG cs.CRcs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CRcs.CY
keywords modelsprivacytrade-offfairnesspfairdpdecisionsdiscoverylearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning models are deployed as a central component in decision making and policy operations with direct impact on individuals' lives. In order to act ethically and comply with government regulations, these models need to make fair decisions and protect the users' privacy. However, such requirements can come with decrease in models' performance compared to their potentially biased, privacy-leaking counterparts. Thus the trade-off between fairness, privacy and performance of ML models emerges, and practitioners need a way of quantifying this trade-off to enable deployment decisions. In this work we interpret this trade-off as a multi-objective optimization problem, and propose PFairDP, a pipeline that uses Bayesian optimization for discovery of Pareto-optimal points between fairness, privacy and utility of ML models. We show how PFairDP can be used to replicate known results that were achieved through manual constraint setting process. We further demonstrate effectiveness of PFairDP with experiments on multiple models and datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools