Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russian

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.04531 v3 pith:LEPA66OS submitted 2024-01-09 cs.CL cs.AI

MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russian

classification cs.CL cs.AI
keywords evaluationmodelsmeraaddressbenchmarkevaluatefeaturesfoundation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Over the past few years, one of the most notable advancements in AI research has been in foundation models (FMs), headlined by the rise of language models (LMs). As the models' size increases, LMs demonstrate enhancements in measurable aspects and the development of new qualitative features. However, despite researchers' attention and the rapid growth in LM application, the capabilities, limitations, and associated risks still need to be better understood. To address these issues, we introduce an open Multimodal Evaluation of Russian-language Architectures (MERA), a new instruction benchmark for evaluating foundation models oriented towards the Russian language. The benchmark encompasses 21 evaluation tasks for generative models in 11 skill domains and is designed as a black-box test to ensure the exclusion of data leakage. The paper introduces a methodology to evaluate FMs and LMs in zero- and few-shot fixed instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. We propose an evaluation methodology, an open-source code base for the MERA assessment, and a leaderboard with a submission system. We evaluate open LMs as baselines and find that they are still far behind the human level. We publicly release MERA to guide forthcoming research, anticipate groundbreaking model features, standardize the evaluation procedure, and address potential societal drawbacks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. TASE: Token Awareness and Structured Evaluation for Multilingual Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    TASE benchmark shows LLMs lag humans on token-level and structural language tasks across Chinese, English, and Korean despite strong high-level performance.

  2. Qwen2.5 Technical Report

    cs.CL 2024-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Qwen2.5 LLMs scale pre-training data to 18 trillion tokens and apply multistage reinforcement learning, achieving competitive performance on benchmarks with models up to 5 times larger.