Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

On-Device Recommender Systems: A Comprehensive Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.11441 v3 pith:UKKWCL2V submitted 2024-01-21 cs.IR

classification cs.IR
keywords devicerssdatarecommendersystemssurveycomprehensiveprivacyresearch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recommender systems have been widely deployed in various real-world applications to help users identify content of interest from massive amounts of information. Traditional recommender systems work by collecting user-item interaction data in a cloud-based data center and training a centralized model to perform the recommendation service. However, such cloud-based recommender systems (CloudRSs) inevitably suffer from excessive resource consumption, response latency, as well as privacy and security risks concerning both data and models. Recently, driven by the advances in storage, communication, and computation capabilities of edge devices, there has been a shift of focus from CloudRSs to on-device recommender systems (DeviceRSs), which leverage the capabilities of edge devices to minimize centralized data storage requirements, reduce the response latency caused by communication overheads, and enhance user privacy and security by localizing data processing and model training. Despite the rapid rise of DeviceRSs, there is a clear absence of timely literature reviews that systematically introduce, categorize and contrast these methods. To bridge this gap, we aim to provide a comprehensive survey of DeviceRSs, covering three main aspects: (1) the deployment and inference of DeviceRSs (2) the training and update of DeviceRSs (3) the security and privacy of DeviceRSs. Furthermore, we provide a fine-grained and systematic taxonomy of the methods involved in each aspect, followed by a discussion regarding challenges and future research directions. This is the first comprehensive survey on DeviceRSs that covers a spectrum of tasks to fit various needs. We believe this survey will help readers effectively grasp the current research status in this field, equip them with relevant technical foundations, and stimulate new research ideas for developing DeviceRSs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Personalization: Federated Recommendation with Calibration via Low-rank Decomposition

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A low-rank buffer matrix that calibrates user embeddings and personalizes item embeddings reduces the distortion caused by federated aggregation and improves recommendation accuracy.

  2. Proxy Model-Guided Reinforcement Learning for Client Selection in Federated Recommendation

    cs.IR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ProxyRL-FRS blends a device-side proxy model that predicts a client's training loss with a staleness-aware reinforcement learning reward to select clients in federated recommendation, reporting accuracy gains on Movie...

  3. Breaking the Aggregation Bottleneck in Federated Recommendation: A Personalized Model Merging Approach

    cs.DC 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    FedEM blends each client's local model with the federated global model to counter the claimed aggregation bottleneck in federated recommendation, where averaging harms personalization.

Pith tools