pith. sign in

arxiv: 2401.12215 · v1 · pith:UG33RM7Onew · submitted 2024-01-22 · 💻 cs.CV

Less Could Be Better: Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning Advances Medical Vision Foundation Models

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords modelsfoundationpeftlearningtasksfine-tuningloramedical
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) that was initially developed for exploiting pre-trained large language models has recently emerged as an effective approach to perform transfer learning on computer vision tasks. However, the effectiveness of PEFT on medical vision foundation models is still unclear and remains to be explored. As a proof of concept, we conducted a detailed empirical study on applying PEFT to chest radiography foundation models. Specifically, we delved into LoRA, a representative PEFT method, and compared it against full-parameter fine-tuning (FFT) on two self-supervised radiography foundation models across three well-established chest radiograph datasets. Our results showed that LoRA outperformed FFT in 13 out of 18 transfer learning tasks by at most 2.9% using fewer than 1% tunable parameters. Combining LoRA with foundation models, we set up new state-of-the-art on a range of data-efficient learning tasks, such as an AUROC score of 80.6% using 1% labeled data on NIH ChestX-ray14. We hope this study can evoke more attention from the community in the use of PEFT for transfer learning on medical imaging tasks. Code and models are available at https://github.com/RL4M/MED-PEFT.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fine-tuning a multimodal large language model for clinician-grade autism behavioral scoring from short home videos

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Fine-tuning Gemini 2.5 Pro with LoRA on 400 home videos improves per-feature agreement with clinicians by 40% and zero-shot ASD diagnosis F1 by 53% on held-out data, with classifier pipelines reaching 77% accuracy.