REVIEW 4 cited by
Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the field of natural language processing, the rapid development of large language model (LLM) has attracted more and more attention. LLMs have shown a high level of creativity in various tasks, but the methods for assessing such creativity are inadequate. The assessment of LLM creativity needs to consider differences from humans, requiring multi-dimensional measurement while balancing accuracy and efficiency. This paper aims to establish an efficient framework for assessing the level of creativity in LLMs. By adapting the modified Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking, the research evaluates the creative performance of various LLMs across 7 tasks, emphasizing 4 criteria including Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, and Elaboration. In this context, we develop a comprehensive dataset of 700 questions for testing and an LLM-based evaluation method. In addition, this study presents a novel analysis of LLMs' responses to diverse prompts and role-play situations. We found that the creativity of LLMs primarily falls short in originality, while excelling in elaboration. Besides, the use of prompts and the role-play settings of the model significantly influence creativity. Additionally, the experimental results also indicate that collaboration among multiple LLMs can enhance originality. Notably, our findings reveal a consensus between human evaluations and LLMs regarding the personality traits that influence creativity. The findings underscore the significant impact of LLM design on creativity and bridges artificial intelligence and human creativity, offering insights into LLMs' creativity and potential applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Dynamic Reinforcement Learning for Actors
A reinforcement learning update that adjusts each neuron's input-output sensitivity using TD error can replace external exploration noise and backpropagation through time in small actor-critic tasks.
-
Generative Artificial Intelligence Extracts Structure-Function Relationships from Plants for New Materials
A generative AI framework that reads plant structure-function literature, generates hypotheses, and produces a lab-validated pollen-based adhesive with measured shear strength.
-
THiNK: Can Large Language Models Think-aloud?
THiNK uses a multi-agent, feedback-driven loop of problem revision and GPT-4O-based Bloom's Taxonomy scoring to measure and improve higher-order thinking in LLMs on math word problems.
-
Advancing the Scientific Method with Large Language Models: From Hypothesis to Discovery
A perspective review argues that LLMs should be deeply integrated into all stages of science, with human oversight and clear metrics, to become creative engines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.