REVIEW 5 cited by
Credal Learning Theory
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Statistical learning theory is the foundation of machine learning, providing theoretical bounds for the risk of models learned from a (single) training set, assumed to issue from an unknown probability distribution. In actual deployment, however, the data distribution may (and often does) vary, causing domain adaptation/generalization issues. In this paper we lay the foundations for a `credal' theory of learning, using convex sets of probabilities (credal sets) to model the variability in the data-generating distribution. Such credal sets, we argue, may be inferred from a finite sample of training sets. Bounds are derived for the case of finite hypotheses spaces (both assuming realizability or not), as well as infinite model spaces, which directly generalize classical results.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
FedGSCA: Medical Federated Learning with Global Sample Selector and Client Adaptive Adjuster under Label Noise
FedGSCA aggregates client-level GMM noise selectors and uses adaptive pseudo-labels with a credal-set robust loss to improve federated medical image classification under label noise.
-
Epistemic Wrapping for Uncertainty Quantification
A Bayesian weight posterior is wrapped into a belief-function posterior via interval masses and a fitted Dirichlet distribution, then used to initialize a Hybrid Interval Neural Network, with reported accuracy and OOD...
-
A Unified Evaluation Framework for Epistemic Predictions
A new metric E = KL distance to the nearest credal-set vertex plus λ times non-specificity ranks uncertainty-aware classifiers under a user-chosen accuracy-precision trade-off.
-
Random-Set Large Language Models
Random-Set LLMs predict belief functions over token clusters and report higher QA accuracy and credal-width uncertainty signals.
-
Epistemic Artificial Intelligence is Essential for Machine Learning Models to Truly 'Know When They Do Not Know'
Machine learning should use second-order uncertainty measures, such as credal sets and random sets, so models can explicitly represent ignorance and avoid overconfident predictions on unfamiliar data.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.