REVIEW 2 cited by
A novel framework for adaptive stress testing of autonomous vehicles in multi-lane roads
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A novel framework for adaptive stress testing of autonomous vehicles in multi-lane roads
read the original abstract
Stress testing is an approach for evaluating the reliability of systems under extreme conditions which help reveal vulnerable scenarios that standard testing may overlook. Identifying such scenarios is of great importance in autonomous vehicles (AV) and other safety-critical systems. Since failure events are rare, naive random search approaches require a large number of vehicle operation hours to identify potential system failures. Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) is a method addressing this constraint by effectively exploring the failure trajectories of AV using a Markov decision process and employs reinforcement learning techniques to identify driving scenarios with high probability of failures. However, existing AST frameworks are able to handle only simple scenarios, such as one vehicle moving longitudinally on a single lane road which is not realistic and has a limited applicability. In this paper, we propose a novel AST framework to systematically explore corner cases of intelligent driving models that can result in safety concerns involving both longitudinal and lateral vehicle's movements. Specially, we develop a new reward function for Deep Reinforcement Learning to guide the AST in identifying crash scenarios based on the collision probability estimate between the AV under test (i.e., the ego vehicle) and the trajectory of other vehicles on the multi-lane roads. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we tested it with a complex driving model vehicle that can be controlled in both longitudinal and lateral directions. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of our experimental results demonstrate that our framework outperforms the state-of-the-art AST scheme in identifying corner cases with complex driving maneuvers.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore
SPHINX generates adversarial driving scenarios by first diagnosing policy failures with XAI and then using VLMs to create targeted critics and scenarios, yielding robustness gains over prior methods on AV benchmarks.
-
SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore
Conditioning adversarial driving-scenario generation on XAI-derived policy failure evidence yields larger post-retraining success-rate gains than ChatScene or LLM-Attacker across multiple AV models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.