pith. sign in

arxiv: 2405.06161 · v5 · pith:OSUN35YHnew · submitted 2024-05-10 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.MA

An Initial Introduction to Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.MA
keywords methodsexecutiontrainingcentralizeddecentralizedduringmarlapproaches
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has exploded in popularity in recent years. While numerous approaches have been developed, they can be broadly categorized into three main types: centralized training and execution (CTE), centralized training for decentralized execution (CTDE), and decentralized training and execution (DTE). CTE methods assume centralization during training and execution (e.g., with fast, free, and perfect communication) and have the most information during execution. CTDE methods are the most common, as they leverage centralized information during training while enabling decentralized execution -- using only information available to that agent during execution. Decentralized training and execution methods make the fewest assumptions and are often simple to implement. This text is an introduction to cooperative MARL -- MARL in which all agents share a single, joint reward. It is meant to explain the setting, basic concepts, and common methods for the CTE, CTDE, and DTE settings. It does not cover all work in cooperative MARL as the area is quite extensive. I have included work that I believe is important for understanding the main concepts in the area and apologize to those that I have omitted. Topics include simple applications of single-agent methods to CTE as well as some more scalable methods that exploit the multi-agent structure, independent Q-learning and policy gradient methods and their extensions, as well as value function factorization methods including the well-known VDN, QMIX, and QPLEX approaches, and centralized critic methods including MADDPG, COMA, and MAPPO. I also discuss common misconceptions, the relationship between different approaches, and some open questions.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Distilling Collaborative Dynamics into Latent Space for Implicit Coordination in Decentralized Multi-Agent Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLS-DP distills multi-agent collaborative dynamics into a latent space inferred from local observations, enabling implicit coordination in decentralized manipulation with 38% mean success rate on RoboFactory tasks.

  2. Distilling Collaborative Dynamics into Latent Space for Implicit Coordination in Decentralized Multi-Agent Manipulation

    cs.RO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    CLS-DP distills privileged multi-agent dynamics into a collaborative latent space that each agent infers from local RGB observations to condition diffusion-based actions, achieving 38% mean success on six RoboFactory ...

  3. Robust Instruction Compliance in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MAVIC corrects Bellman backups at instruction boundaries by adjusting the incoming objective and restoring continuation value, enabling consistent estimation under stochastic instruction switching in a unified policy.

  4. Robust Instruction Compliance in Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    MAVIC corrects Bellman backups at instruction boundaries by adjusting the incoming objective and restoring continuation value, enabling consistent estimation under stochastic instruction switching in cooperative MARL.