REVIEW 1 cited by
Exploring the Interplay of Interpretability and Robustness in Deep Neural Networks: A Saliency-guided Approach
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Exploring the Interplay of Interpretability and Robustness in Deep Neural Networks: A Saliency-guided Approach
read the original abstract
Adversarial attacks pose a significant challenge to deploying deep learning models in safety-critical applications. Maintaining model robustness while ensuring interpretability is vital for fostering trust and comprehension in these models. This study investigates the impact of Saliency-guided Training (SGT) on model robustness, a technique aimed at improving the clarity of saliency maps to deepen understanding of the model's decision-making process. Experiments were conducted on standard benchmark datasets using various deep learning architectures trained with and without SGT. Findings demonstrate that SGT enhances both model robustness and interpretability. Additionally, we propose a novel approach combining SGT with standard adversarial training to achieve even greater robustness while preserving saliency map quality. Our strategy is grounded in the assumption that preserving salient features crucial for correctly classifying adversarial examples enhances model robustness, while masking non-relevant features improves interpretability. Our technique yields significant gains, achieving a 35\% and 20\% improvement in robustness against PGD attack with noise magnitudes of $0.2$ and $0.02$ for the MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, respectively, while producing high-quality saliency maps.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CoT-X: An Adaptive Framework for Cross-Model Chain-of-Thought Transfer and Optimization
An adaptive summarization framework compresses chain-of-thought traces and transfers them across model families, claiming up to 40.5% accuracy gains over truncation on medical QA and 84% fewer configuration evaluation...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.