Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Planning Robot Placement for Object Grasping

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.16692 v1 pith:DQY7YXGA submitted 2024-05-26 cs.RO cs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords robotobjectgraspapproachgraspingtargetthenbaseline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

When performing manipulation-based activities such as picking objects, a mobile robot needs to position its base at a location that supports successful execution. To address this problem, prominent approaches typically rely on costly grasp planners to provide grasp poses for a target object, which are then are then analysed to identify the best robot placements for achieving each grasp pose. In this paper, we propose instead to first find robot placements that would not result in collision with the environment and from where picking up the object is feasible, then evaluate them to find the best placement candidate. Our approach takes into account the robot's reachability, as well as RGB-D images and occupancy grid maps of the environment for identifying suitable robot poses. The proposed algorithm is embedded in a service robotic workflow, in which a person points to select the target object for grasping. We evaluate our approach with a series of grasping experiments, against an existing baseline implementation that sends the robot to a fixed navigation goal. The experimental results show how the approach allows the robot to grasp the target object from locations that are very challenging to the baseline implementation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. GBPP: Grasp-Aware Base Placement Prediction for Robots via Two-Stage Learning

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    GBPP uses 180k cheap heuristic labels plus 12k simulation trials to train a point-cloud classifier that picks a mobile robot's base pose for grasping in about 0.3 seconds.

Pith tools