A note on the second neighborhood problem for k-anti-transitive and m-free digraphs
read the original abstract
Seymour Second Neighborhood Conjecture (SSNC) asserts that every finite oriented graph has a vertex whose second out-neighborhood is at least as large as its first out-neighborhood. Such a vertex is called a Seymour vertex. A digraph $D = (V, E)$ is $k$-anti-transitive if for every pair of vertices $u, v \in V$, the existence of a directed path of length $k$ from $u$ to $v$ implies that $(u, v) \notin E$. An $m$-free digraph is digraph having no directed cycles with length at most $m$. In this paper, we prove that if $D$ is $k$-anti-transitive and $(k-4)$-free digraph, then $D$ has a Seymour vertex. As a consequence, a special case of Caccetta-Haggkvist Conjecture holds on 7-anti-transitive oriented graphs. This work extends recently known results.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A proof of Seymour's second neighborhood conjecture for oriented graphs with minimum out-degree equal to 7
Authors prove Seymour's second neighborhood conjecture for oriented graphs with minimum out-degree 7 via local reductions followed by computer-assisted infeasibility checks on finite obstructions.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.