Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Quantized LLMs: Benchmark, Analysis, and Toolbox

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.12928 v1 pith:OI7KLLGX submitted 2024-06-15 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Quantized LLMs: Benchmark, Analysis, and Toolbox

classification cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL
keywords benchmarkllmsquantizationgeneralizationmodelsquantizedmoduletoolbox
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited exciting progress in multiple scenarios, while the huge computational demands hinder their deployments in lots of real-world applications. As an effective means to reduce memory footprint and inference cost, quantization also faces challenges in performance degradation at low bit-widths. Understanding the impact of quantization on LLM capabilities, especially the generalization ability, is crucial. However, the community's main focus remains on the algorithms and models of quantization, with insufficient attention given to whether the quantized models can retain the strong generalization abilities of LLMs. In this work, we fill this gap by providing a comprehensive benchmark suite for this research topic, including an evaluation system, detailed analyses, and a general toolbox. Specifically, based on the dominant pipeline in LLM quantization, we primarily explore the impact of calibration data distribution on the generalization of quantized LLMs and conduct the benchmark using more than 40 datasets within two main scenarios. Based on this benchmark, we conduct extensive experiments with two well-known LLMs (English and Chinese) and four quantization algorithms to investigate this topic in-depth, yielding several counter-intuitive and valuable findings, e.g., models quantized using a calibration set with the same distribution as the test data are not necessarily optimal. Besides, to facilitate future research, we also release a modular-designed toolbox, which decouples the overall pipeline into several separate components, e.g., base LLM module, dataset module, quantizer module, etc. and allows subsequent researchers to easily assemble their methods through a simple configuration. Our benchmark suite is publicly available at https://github.com/TsingmaoAI/MI-optimize

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantized Large Language Models in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Evaluation and Recommendation

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0

    Quantizing LLMs to 4 or 8 bits cuts GPU memory by up to 75% with generally small performance changes across eight biomedical NLP benchmarks.

  2. K-Quantization and its Impact on Output Performance

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Empirical evaluation of quantization effects on eight LLMs across bit widths, showing performance generally declines at lower precision but with model-size-dependent resilience and acceptable accuracy at 2 bits for ma...