REVIEW 2 cited by
EXAONEPath 1.0 Patch-level Foundation Model for Pathology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
EXAONEPath 1.0 Patch-level Foundation Model for Pathology
read the original abstract
Recent advancements in digital pathology have led to the development of numerous foundational models that utilize self-supervised learning on patches extracted from gigapixel whole slide images (WSIs). While this approach leverages vast amounts of unlabeled data, we have discovered a significant issue: features extracted from these self-supervised models tend to cluster by individual WSIs, a phenomenon we term WSI-specific feature collapse. This problem can potentially limit the model's generalization ability and performance on various downstream tasks. To address this issue, we introduce EXAONEPath, a novel foundational model trained on patches that have undergone stain normalization. Stain normalization helps reduce color variability arising from different laboratories and scanners, enabling the model to learn more consistent features. EXAONEPath is trained using 285,153,903 patches extracted from a total of 34,795 WSIs. Our experiments demonstrate that EXAONEPath significantly mitigates the feature collapse problem, indicating that the model has learned more generalized features rather than overfitting to individual WSI characteristics. We compared EXAONEPath with state-of-the-art models across six downstream task datasets, and our results show that EXAONEPath achieves superior performance relative to the number of WSIs used and the model's parameter count. This suggests that the application of stain normalization has substantially improved the model's efficiency and generalization capabilities.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Good, the Bad, and the Brittle: Benchmarking Robustness and Generalisation of Histopathology Foundation Models
Mid-sized pathology foundation models match or beat billion-parameter ones on clinically realistic perturbations and distribution-shift tests, so scaling alone has largely saturated for robustness.
-
Mitigating Batch Effects in Histopathology via Language-Mediated Robust Embedding Generation
GLMP generates robust pathology embeddings by routing histology images through an intermediate textual representation produced by general-purpose MLLMs to mitigate batch effects.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.