REVIEW 2 cited by
BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
BoFire: Bayesian Optimization Framework Intended for Real Experiments
read the original abstract
Our open-source Python package BoFire combines Bayesian Optimization (BO) with other design of experiments (DoE) strategies focusing on developing and optimizing new chemistry. Previous BO implementations, for example as they exist in the literature or software, require substantial adaptation for effective real-world deployment in chemical industry. BoFire provides a rich feature-set with extensive configurability and realizes our vision of fast-tracking research contributions into industrial use via maintainable open-source software. Owing to quality-of-life features like JSON-serializability of problem formulations, BoFire enables seamless integration of BO into RESTful APIs, a common architecture component for both self-driving laboratories and human-in-the-loop setups. This paper discusses the differences between BoFire and other BO implementations and outlines ways that BO research needs to be adapted for real-world use in a chemistry setting.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
CARE: Controlling LLM-Generated Policies through Auditable Review of Evidence in Scientific Experimentation
CARE improves final-best performance on two HTE benchmarks by using an evidence gate to control LLM policy revisions while defaulting to a standard optimizer.
-
CARE: Controlling LLM-Generated Policies through Auditable Review of Evidence in Scientific Experimentation
CARE introduces an evidence-gated auditable controller for LLM-generated ranking policies in high-throughput experimentation, reporting performance gains on Minerva/Olympus (80.0 to 88.5) and ChemLex (83.9 to 92.1) be...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.