Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Beneath the Surface of Consistency: Exploring Cross-lingual Knowledge Representation Sharing in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2408.10646 v1 pith:6XPHDCET submitted 2024-08-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagesllmsrepresentationacrossknowledgemultilingualabilitylanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The veracity of a factoid is largely independent of the language it is written in. However, language models are inconsistent in their ability to answer the same factual question across languages. This raises questions about how LLMs represent a given fact across languages. We explore multilingual factual knowledge through two aspects: the model's ability to answer a query consistently across languages, and the ability to ''store'' answers in a shared representation for several languages. We propose a methodology to measure the extent of representation sharing across languages by repurposing knowledge editing methods. We examine LLMs with various multilingual configurations using a new multilingual dataset. We reveal that high consistency does not necessarily imply shared representation, particularly for languages with different scripts. Moreover, we find that script similarity is a dominant factor in representation sharing. Finally, we observe that if LLMs could fully share knowledge across languages, their accuracy in their best-performing language could benefit an increase of up to 150\% on average. These findings highlight the need for improved multilingual knowledge representation in LLMs and suggest a path for the development of more robust and consistent multilingual LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can Gradient Descent Simulate Prompting?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A MAML-style meta-training objective makes a single gradient step on new text recover part of the performance that prompting achieves, on reversal-curse and passage-QA tasks.

  2. Position: It's Time to Optimize LLMs for Self-Consistency

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper proposes self-consistency, a mathematical framework that treats relationships between model outputs across related inputs as the primary training target, unifying many existing alignment and robustness methods.

  3. Towards Multilingual LLM Evaluation for Baltic and Nordic languages: A study on Lithuanian History

    cs.CL 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    On a translated Lithuanian history multiple-choice benchmark, GPT-4o beats all tested open and Nordic-tuned models, and Nordic-language fine-tuning does not improve accuracy.

Pith tools