Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.14729 v2 pith:QBW76FOV submitted 2024-09-23 cs.CR cs.AI

PROMPTFUZZ: Harnessing Fuzzing Techniques for Robust Testing of Prompt Injection in LLMs

classification cs.CR cs.AI
keywords llmspromptpromptfuzzattacksinjectionpromptsrobustnesstesting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread use in various applications due to their powerful capability to generate human-like text. However, prompt injection attacks, which involve overwriting a model's original instructions with malicious prompts to manipulate the generated text, have raised significant concerns about the security and reliability of LLMs. Ensuring that LLMs are robust against such attacks is crucial for their deployment in real-world applications, particularly in critical tasks. In this paper, we propose PROMPTFUZZ, a novel testing framework that leverages fuzzing techniques to systematically assess the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks. Inspired by software fuzzing, PROMPTFUZZ selects promising seed prompts and generates a diverse set of prompt injections to evaluate the target LLM's resilience. PROMPTFUZZ operates in two stages: the prepare phase, which involves selecting promising initial seeds and collecting few-shot examples, and the focus phase, which uses the collected examples to generate diverse, high-quality prompt injections. Using PROMPTFUZZ, we can uncover more vulnerabilities in LLMs, even those with strong defense prompts. By deploying the generated attack prompts from PROMPTFUZZ in a real-world competition, we achieved the 7th ranking out of over 4000 participants (top 0.14%) within 2 hours. Additionally, we construct a dataset to fine-tune LLMs for enhanced robustness against prompt injection attacks. While the fine-tuned model shows improved robustness, PROMPTFUZZ continues to identify vulnerabilities, highlighting the importance of robust testing for LLMs. Our work emphasizes the critical need for effective testing tools and provides a practical framework for evaluating and improving the robustness of LLMs against prompt injection attacks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SecureWebArena: A Holistic Security Evaluation Benchmark for LVLM-based Web Agents

    cs.CR 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    SecureWebArena is a new benchmark suite for holistic security evaluation of LVLM-based web agents using diverse simulated environments, attack taxonomies, and multi-layered failure analysis across reasoning, behavior,...

  2. Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Detect-and-misdirect defenses bound asymptotic attacker success rates in model-guided jailbreaks on agentic AI, with CMPE reducing estimated ASR upper bounds by up to two orders of magnitude.

  3. Analyzing Defensive Misdirection Against Model-Guided Automated Attacks on Agentic AI Systems

    cs.CR 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Detect-and-misdirect defenses bound asymptotic attacker success rates in model-guided jailbreaks on agentic AI, unlike detect-and-block which permit near-certain success with sufficient queries.

  4. Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model and Agent Safety

    cs.CR 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A comprehensive survey that taxonomizes safety threats to large models and agents, reviews defenses and benchmarks, and outlines open challenges.