REVIEW 3 cited by
A Systematic Review on Prompt Engineering in Large Language Models for K-12 STEM Education
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to enhance K-12 STEM education by improving both teaching and learning processes. While previous studies have shown promising results, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding regarding how LLMs are effectively applied, specifically through prompt engineering-the process of designing prompts to generate desired outputs. To address this gap, our study investigates empirical research published between 2021 and 2024 that explores the use of LLMs combined with prompt engineering in K-12 STEM education. Following the PRISMA protocol, we screened 2,654 papers and selected 30 studies for analysis. Our review identifies the prompting strategies employed, the types of LLMs used, methods of evaluating effectiveness, and limitations in prior work. Results indicate that while simple and zero-shot prompting are commonly used, more advanced techniques like few-shot and chain-of-thought prompting have demonstrated positive outcomes for various educational tasks. GPT-series models are predominantly used, but smaller and fine-tuned models (e.g., Blender 7B) paired with effective prompt engineering outperform prompting larger models (e.g., GPT-3) in specific contexts. Evaluation methods vary significantly, with limited empirical validation in real-world settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Asking Questions the Right Way: A Multi-Agent Conversational System for Prompt Formulation in Complex Task Resolution
An eight-agent question-asking system that front-loads intent clarification produced more complete prompts, higher-rated outputs, and single-turn task completion in a four-person pilot, with unstable effect sizes.
-
Practice Less, Explain More: LLM-Supported Self-Explanation Improves Explanation Quality on Transfer Problems in Calculus
LLM-supported open-ended self-explanation improved explanation quality on Not-Enough-Information calculus transfer problems versus control, with no post-test accuracy gains and far fewer practice problems completed.
-
Comparing RAG and GraphRAG for Page-Level Retrieval Question Answering on a Math Textbook
On a 477-question page-level math textbook benchmark, embedding-based RAG with voyage-3-large reaches 99.4% top-10 retrieval accuracy and outperforms GraphRAG for retrieval and answer quality.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.