REVIEW 2 major objections 2 cited by
Quantum CORDIC -- Arcsine on a Budget
T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3
Pith's one-line read A reversible quantum CORDIC algorithm computes the arcsine function using O(n) qubits for n-bit precision.
desk verdict The paper gives a reversible quantum CORDIC for arcsine with claimed O(n) qubits, O(n log n) layers and O(n²) CNOTs, but those numbers rest on unshown circuit details. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The reversible CORDIC iteration adapted for quantum circuits, which uses bit shifts and additions implemented reversibly to approximate trigonometric functions.
What would settle it
An explicit circuit construction or simulation for small n that requires more than O(n squared) CNOTs or fails to achieve the claimed precision would falsify the resource claims.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The authors detail multiple approaches to calculate the arcsine function reversibly with CORDIC, establishing that for n bits of precision the method requires order n qubits, order n log n layers, and order n squared CNOTs while avoiding non-reversible operations.
Load-bearing premise
Non-reversible operations in classical CORDIC can be replaced by fully reversible quantum equivalents without increasing the asymptotic resource counts.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Provides a required step for the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd algorithm.
- Supports quantum digital-to-analog conversion.
- Simplifies quantum speed-ups for Monte-Carlo methods.
- Enables direct applications in quantum estimation of Shapley values.
Reading between the lines
- Similar reversible adaptations could apply to other elementary functions computable by CORDIC such as arctangent or square root.
- The stated bounds allow direct substitution into larger quantum circuits without changing their leading asymptotic costs.
- Hardware implementations could test the layer and CNOT counts on small-scale quantum processors for moderate n.
Signed reviews
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript introduces a reversible quantum adaptation of the classical CORDIC algorithm to compute the arcsine function to arbitrary precision. It asserts that multiple reversible approaches exist and claims that, for n bits of precision, the construction uses O(n) qubits, O(n log n) layers, and O(n²) CNOT gates. The work positions this primitive as relevant to HHL, quantum digital-to-analog conversion, Monte-Carlo speed-ups, and Shapley-value estimation.
Significance. If the stated resource bounds can be rigorously established, the result would supply a useful, asymptotically efficient quantum primitive for arcsine that avoids the overhead of general function-approximation techniques. The applications listed are standard motivations for such a primitive.
major comments (2)
- [Abstract] Abstract: the central complexity claim (O(n) qubits, O(n log n) layers, O(n²) CNOTs) is asserted without any explicit reversible circuit construction, gate-sequence accounting, or analysis of ancilla overhead and uncomputation costs required to replace the classical non-reversible conditional rotations and sign decisions.
- [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'multiple approaches' exist to make CORDIC fully reversible is not accompanied by even a high-level description of how the iterative shifts, adds, and decision logic are realized reversibly while preserving the claimed asymptotics; without this, the load-bearing step from classical CORDIC to the quoted quantum costs cannot be verified.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the detailed review and for highlighting opportunities to improve clarity in the abstract. The full manuscript contains explicit reversible circuit constructions, gate accounting, and ancilla analysis in Sections 3–5; the abstract was intentionally kept concise. We will revise the abstract to incorporate high-level descriptions and section references while preserving the stated asymptotics, which follow directly from the constructions provided.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central complexity claim (O(n) qubits, O(n log n) layers, O(n²) CNOTs) is asserted without any explicit reversible circuit construction, gate-sequence accounting, or analysis of ancilla overhead and uncomputation costs required to replace the classical non-reversible conditional rotations and sign decisions.
Authors: The body of the manuscript (Sections 3 and 4) supplies the explicit reversible constructions, including the handling of conditional rotations via reversible sign decisions, the uncomputation of ancillae after each iteration, and the precise CNOT and layer counts that establish the O(n), O(n log n), and O(n²) bounds. To make these claims verifiable from the abstract alone, we will add a single sentence summarizing the reversible adaptations and directing readers to the relevant sections. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'multiple approaches' exist to make CORDIC fully reversible is not accompanied by even a high-level description of how the iterative shifts, adds, and decision logic are realized reversibly while preserving the claimed asymptotics; without this, the load-bearing step from classical CORDIC to the quoted quantum costs cannot be verified.
Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from a brief high-level outline of the reversible realizations. The manuscript already details two distinct approaches (one based on reversible comparison and one using controlled phase rotations) in Section 3, with the asymptotic analysis in Section 5 showing that both preserve the claimed resource bounds. In revision we will insert a short clause in the abstract describing the core reversible primitives (reversible shifts via bit-permutation networks, additions via ripple-carry or carry-lookahead, and decisions via reversible comparators) and reference the sections containing the full accounting. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity; resource claims are constructive estimates from proposed reversible circuits
full rationale
The paper presents an algorithmic construction for a reversible quantum CORDIC implementation to compute arcsine. The stated asymptotic resource counts (O(n) qubits, O(n log n) layers, O(n²) CNOTs) are forward-looking estimates derived from the described circuit primitives and reversibility adaptations, not from any fitted parameters, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. No equations or derivations in the provided text reduce the output claims to the inputs by construction. The work is self-contained as a proposal for circuit design, with the central premise being the existence of reversible equivalents rather than a tautological renaming or fit.
Assumptions & free parameters
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Quantum CORDIC -- Arcsine on a Budget." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M6DUERIP
@misc{pith2026241114434,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Quantum CORDIC -- Arcsine on a Budget},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M6DUERIP}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.14434}
}
read the original abstract
This work introduces a quantum algorithm for computing the function arcsine, with arbitrary accuracy. We leverage a technique from embedded computing and field-programmable gate arrays, called COordinate Rotation DIgital Computer (CORDIC). CORDIC is a family of iterative algorithms that, in a classical context, can approximate various trigonometric, hyperbolic, and elementary functions using only bit shifts and additions. Adapting CORDIC to the quantum context is non-trivial, as the algorithm traditionally uses several non-reversible operations. We detail a method for CORDIC that avoids such non-reversible operations. We propose an approach to calculate the arcsine function reversibly with CORDIC. For n bits of precision, our method has space complexity of order n qubits, a layer count in the order of n times log n, and a CNOT count in the order of n squared. This primitive function is a required step for the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) algorithm, is necessary for quantum digital-to-analog conversion, can simplify a quantum speed-up for Monte-Carlo methods, and has direct applications in the quantum estimation of Shapley values.
Figures
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Constants.leanphi_golden_ratio echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
#iter← 5φ^{-mn} ▷ φ = (1 + √5)/2 ; F←[1,1,2,3,5,8,13,…] Fibonacci Sequence
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fullqubit alchemist: Quantum algorithm for alchemical free energy calculations
A quantum algorithm for alchemical free energy calculations that block-encodes the Liouvillian to simulate molecular dynamics with polylogarithmic precision scaling, avoiding entropy estimation.
-
A Shapley Value Estimation Speedup for Efficient Explainable Quantum AI
Quantum amplitude estimation can estimate Shapley values with O(1/ε) queries to the value function, a quadratic improvement over classical Monte Carlo's O(σ²/ε²).
Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.