Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

PerPO: Perceptual Preference Optimization via Discriminative Rewarding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.04371 v1 pith:M7TM3UQ2 submitted 2025-02-05 cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG

PerPO: Perceptual Preference Optimization via Discriminative Rewarding

classification cs.AI cs.CLcs.LG
keywords perpomllmsoptimizationpreferencevisualdiscriminativegenerativealignment
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper presents Perceptual Preference Optimization (PerPO), a perception alignment method aimed at addressing the visual discrimination challenges in generative pre-trained multimodal large language models (MLLMs). To align MLLMs with human visual perception process, PerPO employs discriminative rewarding to gather diverse negative samples, followed by listwise preference optimization to rank them.By utilizing the reward as a quantitative margin for ranking, our method effectively bridges generative preference optimization and discriminative empirical risk minimization. PerPO significantly enhances MLLMs' visual discrimination capabilities while maintaining their generative strengths, mitigates image-unconditional reward hacking, and ensures consistent performance across visual tasks. This work marks a crucial step towards more perceptually aligned and versatile MLLMs. We also hope that PerPO will encourage the community to rethink MLLM alignment strategies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Multimodal Reward Hacking in Reinforcement Learning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Imperfect multimodal RL rewards systematically create new failures (NRFR > RHR); scaling and answer-aware rewards help but do not eliminate hacking, and unreliable visual verifiers actively increase it.

  2. From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The survey formalizes MLLM perception as a unified vision-language capability and traces its evolution via a new five-stage taxonomy while outlining future challenges.