Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Model-Centric Review of Deep Learning for Protein Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.19173 v1 pith:KBQNBM67 submitted 2025-02-26 cs.LG q-bio.BM

A Model-Centric Review of Deep Learning for Protein Design

classification cs.LG q-bio.BM
keywords proteindesignmodelsadvancescurrentdeeplearningalphafold
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning has transformed protein design, enabling accurate structure prediction, sequence optimization, and de novo protein generation. Advances in single-chain protein structure prediction via AlphaFold2, RoseTTAFold, ESMFold, and others have achieved near-experimental accuracy, inspiring successive work extended to biomolecular complexes via AlphaFold Multimer, RoseTTAFold All-Atom, AlphaFold 3, Chai-1, Boltz-1 and others. Generative models such as ProtGPT2, ProteinMPNN, and RFdiffusion have enabled sequence and backbone design beyond natural evolution-based limitations. More recently, joint sequence-structure co-design models, including ESM3, have integrated both modalities into a unified framework, resulting in improved designability. Despite these advances, challenges still exist pertaining to modeling sequence-structure-function relationships and ensuring robust generalization beyond the regions of protein space spanned by the training data. Future advances will likely focus on joint sequence-structure-function co-design frameworks that are able to model the fitness landscape more effectively than models that treat these modalities independently. Current capabilities, coupled with the dizzying rate of progress, suggest that the field will soon enable rapid, rational design of proteins with tailored structures and functions that transcend the limitations imposed by natural evolution. In this review, we discuss the current capabilities of deep learning methods for protein design, focusing on some of the most revolutionary and capable models with respect to their functionality and the applications that they enable, leading up to the current challenges of the field and the optimal path forward.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a three-stage language-interfaced benchmark revealing that no current LLM performs strongly across recognition, engineering, and generation of proteins.

  2. VibeProteinBench: An Evaluation Benchmark for Language-interfaced Vibe Protein Design

    q-bio.QM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    VibeProteinBench is a new benchmark evaluating LLMs on open-ended language-interfaced protein design across recognition, engineering, and generation, with no model showing strong performance in all areas.

  3. Rethinking Scientific Discovery in the Agentic Era

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    SCION claims an agentic OS with Research Execution Plans and layered memory that beats autonomous research-agent baselines on reading, ideation, molecule design, and antibody screening.