REVIEW 3 cited by
A Survey on Transformer Context Extension: Approaches and Evaluation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Survey on Transformer Context Extension: Approaches and Evaluation
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) based on Transformer have been widely applied in the filed of natural language processing (NLP), demonstrating strong performance, particularly in handling short text tasks. However, when it comes to long context scenarios, the performance of LLMs degrades due to some challenges. To alleviate this phenomenon, there is a number of work proposed recently. In this survey, we first list the challenges of applying pre-trained LLMs to process long contexts. Then systematically review the approaches related to long context and propose our taxonomy categorizing them into four main types: positional encoding, context compression, retrieval augmented, and attention pattern. In addition to the approaches, we focus on the evaluation of long context, organizing relevant data, tasks, and metrics based on existing long context benchmarks. Finally, we summarize unresolved issues in the long context domain and put forward our views on future developments.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
CoSA: Accelerating Long-Context Inference via Proxy-Kernel Co-Designed Sparse Attention
CoSA couples an order-aware sparse-mask proxy with a skip-capable attention kernel, achieving higher long-context accuracy at lower compute budgets than existing sparse-attention baselines.
-
Distill-then-Replace: Efficient Task-Specific Hybrid Attention Model Construction
Distill-then-Replace builds task-specific hybrid attention LLMs by distilling each full-attention block into a linear counterpart and greedily replacing layers under a validation-performance constraint.
-
Optical Context Compression Is Just (Bad) Autoencoding
Vision-based optical context compression performs no better than direct autoencoding baselines like mean pooling or hierarchical encoders across compression ratios.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.