REVIEW 2 cited by
Difference-in-Differences Designs: A Practitioner's Guide
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Difference-in-differences (DiD) is arguably the most popular quasi-experimental research design. Its canonical form, with two groups and two periods, is well-understood. However, empirical practices can be ad hoc when researchers go beyond that simple case. This article provides an organizing framework for discussing different types of DiD designs and their associated DiD estimators. It discusses covariates, weights, handling multiple periods, and staggered treatments. The organizational framework, however, applies to other extensions of DiD methods as well.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On a Debiased and Semiparametric Efficient Changes-in-Changes Estimator
A covariate-conditional distributional bridge identifies the ATT under non-monotonic confounding and yields a Neyman-orthogonal, semiparametrically efficient estimator.
-
Compositional difference-in-differences
A difference-in-differences estimator for categorical outcomes that identifies counterfactual category counts and shares under proportional-growth parallel trends, with applications to early voting and RGGI.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.