REVIEW 4 cited by
LD-Scene: LLM-Guided Diffusion for Controllable Generation of Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
LD-Scene: LLM-Guided Diffusion for Controllable Generation of Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios
read the original abstract
Ensuring the safety and robustness of autonomous driving systems necessitates a comprehensive evaluation in safety-critical scenarios. However, these safety-critical scenarios are rare and difficult to collect from real-world driving data, posing significant challenges to effectively assessing the performance of autonomous vehicles. Typical existing methods often suffer from limited controllability and lack user-friendliness, as extensive expert knowledge is essentially required. To address these challenges, we propose LD-Scene, a novel framework that integrates Large Language Models (LLMs) with Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) for user-controllable adversarial scenario generation through natural language. Our approach comprises an LDM that captures realistic driving trajectory distributions and an LLM-based guidance module that translates user queries into adversarial loss functions, facilitating the generation of scenarios aligned with user queries. The guidance module integrates an LLM-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) code generator and an LLM-based code debugger, enhancing the controllability and robustness in generating guidance functions. Extensive experiments conducted on the nuScenes dataset demonstrate that LD-Scene achieves state-of-the-art performance in generating realistic, diverse, and effective adversarial scenarios. Furthermore, our framework provides fine-grained control over adversarial behaviors, thereby facilitating more effective testing tailored to specific driving scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
CCFM: Collision-Constrained Flow Matching for Safety-Critical Scenario Generation
Hard-constrained flow matching with a heuristic selector and Gauss-Newton projection produces type-controllable collisions at 46–83 % rates for AV safety evaluation.
-
SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore
SPHINX generates adversarial driving scenarios by first diagnosing policy failures with XAI and then using VLMs to create targeted critics and scenarios, yielding robustness gains over prior methods on AV benchmarks.
-
SPHINX: First Explain, Then Explore
Conditioning adversarial driving-scenario generation on XAI-derived policy failure evidence yields larger post-retraining success-rate gains than ChatScene or LLM-Attacker across multiple AV models.
-
A Survey on the Applications of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Automated Driving Systems Test Scenario Generation Methods
A literature survey of scenario-generation methods for ADS testing that adds an unvalidated AII/RAS/OCS metric suite and ODD-difficulty schema, undermined by inconsistent calculations in the worked examples.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.