Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Scenarios in Computing Research: A Systematic Review of the Use of Scenario Methods for Exploring the Future of Computing Technologies in Society

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2506.05605 v1 pith:TO4BJL36 submitted 2025-06-05 cs.HC cs.AI

classification cs.HCcs.AI
keywords scenarioscenariosbuildingcomputingtechnologiescomputerfutureliterature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Scenario building is an established method to anticipate the future of emerging technologies. Its primary goal is to use narratives to map future trajectories of technology development and sociotechnical adoption. Following this process, risks and benefits can be identified early on, and strategies can be developed that strive for desirable futures. In recent years, computer science has adopted this method and applied it to various technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI). Because computing technologies play such an important role in shaping modern societies, it is worth exploring how scenarios are being used as an anticipatory tool in the field -- and what possible traditional uses of scenarios are not yet covered but have the potential to enrich the field. We address this gap by conducting a systematic literature review on the use of scenario building methods in computer science over the last decade (n = 59). We guide the review along two main questions. First, we aim to uncover how scenarios are used in computing literature, focusing especially on the rationale for why scenarios are used. Second, in following the potential of scenario building to enhance inclusivity in research, we dive deeper into the participatory element of the existing scenario building literature in computer science.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    A genetic algorithm optimizes weighted combinations of LLM-perceived harm mitigation, expert costs, and participatory scores over stakeholder-action pairs to surface viable AI policy packages for media harms.

  2. Informing AI Policy Assessment using Large-Scale Simulation of Interventions

    cs.CY 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A genetic algorithm exploring billions of policy combinations, scored by LLM-evaluated harm mitigation, expert cost, and participatory ratings, identifies viable AI policy options under different weighting schemes.

Pith tools